Contact

Contact

For the possibility of internships or lab visits, please contact Mario Senden via mario.senden@maastrichtuniversity.nl


Department of Cognitive Neuroscience

Maastricht University

Oxfordlaan 55
6229EV Maastricht





Department of Cognitive Neuroscience

Maastricht University

Oxfordlaan 55
6229EV Maastricht



Configural properties underlie the perceived faceness of a stimulus


Journal article


Carmine Gnolo, M. Senden, A. Grillini, F. Cornelissen, R. Goebel
bioRxiv, 2018

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Gnolo, C., Senden, M., Grillini, A., Cornelissen, F., & Goebel, R. (2018). Configural properties underlie the perceived faceness of a stimulus. BioRxiv.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Gnolo, Carmine, M. Senden, A. Grillini, F. Cornelissen, and R. Goebel. “Configural Properties Underlie the Perceived Faceness of a Stimulus.” bioRxiv (2018).


MLA   Click to copy
Gnolo, Carmine, et al. “Configural Properties Underlie the Perceived Faceness of a Stimulus.” BioRxiv, 2018.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{carmine2018a,
  title = {Configural properties underlie the perceived faceness of a stimulus},
  year = {2018},
  journal = {bioRxiv},
  author = {Gnolo, Carmine and Senden, M. and Grillini, A. and Cornelissen, F. and Goebel, R.}
}

Abstract

The global geometrical arrangement of face parts (eyes over nose over mouth), commonly referred to as first order configural (FOC) properties, is believed to constitute a fundamental aspect of face detection. Indeed, several brain regions in the face processing network have been shown to display increased activity in response to abstract stimuli for face-like as compared to random spatial arrangements. However, the absence of a mathematical formalization of FOC properties makes it difficult to systematically study their contribution to face perception. To fill this gap, we used analytical geometry to define a set of 19 FOC features. In two psychophysical studies, a 2-alternative forced choice task assessing difference in perceived faceness between two stimuli and a Likert test assessing measuring perceived faceness of individual stimuli, we evaluated the contribution of each feature to the perceived faceness of abstract stimuli consisting of four black rectangular shapes reflecting the two eyes, the nose and the mouth. From the two experiments two subsets of features relevant for face detection were selected, including 10 and 11 features, respectively. Interestingly, 7 features are shared between the two sets. The difference between the subsets reflects processing of individual FOC features in the first study and holistic processing in the second study. The partial superimposition, on the other hand, is reflective of a shared basic mechanism in the perception of first order configural properties.


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in